Christian Vanneste - Deputy of the North

The Courage Of Common sense!

What means Affair Vanneste

By Christian Vanneste 11 mar 2008 in In the press

The Shouting of the TaxpayerThe weekly of the very active Association The taxpayers associates, The Shouting of the Taxpayer, returns in its edition of Saturday, March 8th, on what it was necessary to call Affair Vanneste or killing of the freedom of opinion in France.

It is just the object of this article that performs a collation of the book that Fran ois Billot was kind enough to dedicate me (Affair Vanneste, at Fran ois-Xavier de Guibert). Do not hesitate to visit his notepad .

Extracted of .

Affair Vanneste? Recall of facts: autumn, 2004: Christian Vanneste, deputy from the North, intervenes in the Assembly on the occasion of the creation of HALDE (High authority of struggle against discriminations and for equality). In an incredible hubbub, the deputy declares that homosexuality could not be established as universal behaviour, otherwise the humanity would go to its loss. Clamour! Affair VannesteThe deputies are confused by this revelation. Christian Vanneste will take back his purposes owing the press. Attacked by homosexual associations, he will be condemned in 2006 by the court of Lille for heavy fines. Condemnations confirmed in call next year. But preempted by the people: ( ) the deputy comes in general elections in June, 2007 and will be triumphantly reelected, with 58 % voices ( ) le d put se pr sente aux l gislatives en juin 2007 et sera triomphalement r lu, avec 58 % des voix

The real country rose up against the lawful country.

Affair Vanneste is a State affair, writes Fran ois Billot in (F.-X. of Guibert), because she attains in depth the foundations of democracy: freedom of opinion and its corollary, the freedom of expression. He reminds that HALDE was created, in 2004, in the haste, following an attack " homophobe , which turned out to be a manipulation! Putting in bare the hellish mechanism which gave birth to a new legislative armory, the author comes back on the audacious action of a deputy who, braved intellectual terrorism. These have long memory. They made him pay its freedom of mind to strong price

1 Comment (s)

  1. A group of comic actors, the "Unknowns" complained that currently it is possible to say nothing more what of more logical and legitimate when one (however, by ex, the women represent 50 % populations) derides at minorities, is humiliated in the name of one-way humour and that this ignominy encourage weak minds (of type " Beauf " by ex) to give free rein to their impulses full of hatred and criminal as the tabassage of homosexuals (the feminine couple near Avesnes on Helpe notably) or the systematic deterioration of the picture of the woman, especially if she is emancipated and do not answer the standarts of the patriarchal dictatorship the Taliban of which are only extreme expression.
    Not freedom means to say anything! think in terms full of hatred is a right but not to express it especially in terms of "superiority" (sinister not very distant memories!) of a category of citizens, she should be majority, to the detriment of other one, in this case that of homosexuals of whom I am part.
    I hate the communautarisme when this one is obvious before a possible rejection I explain, in comparison with those and those who want to impose a way of life (Islamic communautarisme - and you know what that is in Roubaix in thousand places of the respect for the women, for the homosexuals, for the atheists, for the non-Muslims, etc) foreign to our country said about human rights (the Netherlands are in facts THE country of human rights on many subjects existing everywhere else in Occident but of which they are hypocritically unaware as France neither nor categorise).
    We wish more than others but especially not less! why a heterosexual exhibitionism publicly (the ancient generations of which besides refrain) and equality for us? we are not more salacious or indecent than others.
    Why this fallacious and vile assimilation between paedophilia and homosexuality for full of hatred phobic without arguments? in facts, how many " true families " where reigns the incest of the father towards the small girls especially?
    The definition of marriage changes and France will not be able to stay for a long time even at the rear of platoon with the most intolerant countries.
    Why not to condemn the couples so above all h t ros voluntarily sterile if for you marriage = procreation?

    I am homosexual (this does not choose and we have neither to be ashamed there nor proud of it, it is so bar), pratiquante Catholic (dissatisfies there the religious zealots who favour the cruel and ancient, old-fashioned letter to mind: why do not they also demand stoning for many adulteries crossed in morals?) and very poured into spiritualities, cultivated, State civil servant (no vychistes laws for us in your programme?) and I do not support to be assimilated with a citizen of second zone with more duties than rights.

    Thank you for having read me.
    A sister in humanity equal to you even if she remains prohibited of marriage in her fatherland (I speak of true marriage, that of Love and not the paper marriage which I would contact if I was forced in h t ro marriage).

    Catherine May 4th, 2008 Answer

Post a comment on the article "what means Affair Vanneste"

Copyright Christian Vanneste - Deputy of the North 2007. All rights reserved.