By Christian Vanneste 3 july 2009 in not classifying
I received more than a dozen answers to written Questions as various as various: security, justice, health
Prolific Mr Vanneste! (Or assisting parliamentarian (s) ? Go, no jealous man. Bravo in two!!)
- 2009 struggles for the screening of the cancer July 3: good point for the Minister, who answers subject. To follow therefore.
- Abolition of the school map July 3, on 2009: rather agreed, in the field, with the Minister. A small thing would be well however: that the elected representatives show the ex by putting their own children in the state school (a kind of obligation of elected representative). By making it, not only the teaching staff will be flattered of the respect of the elected representatives towards the state school, but especially the citizens would be them the same reassured on the quality of education. It goes without saying that if an elected representative or a Minister has his children in state school, he is going more to get out of the way to obtain results, than if his child is "preserved" via a private school.
- State education: the book simplified July 3, on 2009 Good thing when this book. Alone small problem: "valuation" of the pupils does not respect school rhythm. So, this year, the pupils have them questioned (via valuation) on themes that they learn that at the turn of the year school. Of course, there is a politicking interest there indoors: as the pupils cannot make valuation, it can be said that our children are more any than those of one century ago. And the new Minister arrives with "his" reform. And, ho strange, valuation which follows watch that the children grab problem better. And the Minister to exclaim it is thanks to me . While in reality, it is because the children learnt things!
- More culture g in the competition of the civil service July 3, on 2009 It justifies in no way the abandonment of the general knowledge! And then, sincerely, connaitre the country, to know how it works, to appropriate it, it is so much criteria which are going to allow to all civil servants (any categories) to do their job as it befits one.
- Precision about the auto-entrepreneuriat July 3, on 2009 necessary Precision And really, excel status!!!
- On danger linked to the botox July 3, on 2009 Good initiative of the Minister!
- Struggle of the Government counters school absenteeism July 3, on 2009
It what would be well, especially, it is a letter of the inspector of academy to the parents, notably those who go on holiday before school end of year. Today, many managers of school remind the parents that the school is compulsory But since behind hierarchy do not follow
The abolition of allocs seems to me to be a good thing, and replacement by tools of support of the pupil, which should not be wronged, also (he has not to pay the irresponsibility of his parents)
I think that it is necessary, moreover, to give the ex . It parried animal, I admit it But how to explain to parents that their child should not miss the school, that absenteeism is terrible While the representatives of aforementioned parents, to the National Assembly and to the Senate, make the Parliament shrubby and not are never punished for their absenteeism? (What is besides distasteful, in sense where the hardworking elected representatives, they, are wronged And what this attitude of some some rotted the picture of the Parliament as a whole)
They want that the children are present at the school? That the elected representatives Assemble! The effect of mimicry is forgotten by the Parliament. It is however proved to be. An ex? One century ago and about, never it would have been possible to think that Frenchmen would agree to pay with some paper money. Even though they would deposit some money in a place called "bank". A well-known character changed things: Napoleon Bonaparte. That ci perfectly understood that if they wanted that the very new Bank of France has clients He shows that he even was not afraid for his money. Once the money of put down Napoleon Frenchmen followed! And really there, it is a bit the same thing: when the elected representatives si geront young Frenchmen will not be away any more ongoing. Et bien l , c est un peu la m me chose : le jour o les lus si geront Les jeunes Fran ais ne seront plus absents en cours.
Idem. When the elected representatives will spend the public funds with intelligence and caution, and cease throwing it by the window Frenchmen will give up defrauding the tax Офис, the s cu, etc.
- Magistracy: helpers of justice July 3, on 2009
ho there there! You have a ticket with MAM MISTER " the honourable member of Parliament "!!!
- Of the subject of the near judges July 3, on 2009
I do not understand reasoning well. The near judges are tremendous Where from it is not only necessary to abolish them, but to put the survivors more in TGI, in short to move them away from citizens?
- Reform of the solicitors July 3, on 2009
Let us wait therefore to see of what will think of it the Parliament
- Of the subject of the provocations of Act-Up July 3, on 2009
In short provocations can go on, and the Christians have only to close it! I do not dare to think of opposite reaction that there would have been, if it was a synagogue or a mosque that had made the object of such provocation!
- Detachment of the world trade July 3, on 2009
Tremendous G20 where they agreed to keep status quo! Historical compromise indeed! "Air current" was preached against mediocre protectionism and for the opening there! Mrs Lagarde merges the protectionism of 29, which really was harmful, with a clever protectionism, such as exercises it by ex China or USA Europe continuing being from an unhealthy naivet on subject!!! The patent is a form of protectionism. Royalties also. Mrs Lagarde intends t her to struggle against this monstrosity?
- Procedures hired for racism July 3, on 2009
Problem, it is that the "governments" give to understand that racism anti white does not exist. It is extremely shocking, in this respect, that the Minister considers it a good idea to intervene publicly (via media) on attacks against some "blacks" But makes the official report only of the violation of the right to the picture, as regards the famous attack of a "white" in the underground!
He can be as, would agree to register in law, as the bus drivers owe (when they can him) inform police force, when such ' event happens in their bus, and that the passengers they the same are liable by sanctions for not assistance to person in danger when a young man or a girl is attacked, under the eyes. The slightest "assistance" consisting in calling the police.
- Pole job and role Houses of job (QE) June, 17, on 2009
Affair to be followed.
- Road prevention regarding the cyclists (QE) June, 17, on 2009
All this does not justify the treatment made to this woman! And how many others!! Why isn't t there explained to this woman the reason of his presence in these places? Why have him t they asked to take away his under clothes? Who allows the similar humiliation? As for the highway code It concerns lorries, cars, and motorcycles. Bikes really do not have "highway code". Is possible be would admit him that they have of it a specific? (How many cyclists know if they can or not, by ex, pass to red fires?)
- Dangerous and practical games violent at the school (QE) June, 10, on 2009
I could note that in some "school" works these "games" are introduced. It would be good to know where the children find " the inspiration " to "play such "games", if they want to eradicate problem. Series TV? School Manuel? Internet? "Traditional" media (they find in detail, in some newspapers, how to accomplish the game of the scarf by ex)?
-Testing and doubtful practices of Halde (QE) June, 10, on 2009
Therefore if I understand well, the Government must continue closing eyes, and throw the money of the taxpayer - which finances Halde otherwise taxpayer - by the window! OK, let us take at the word. Since the Minister can nothing To The Parliament not to reissue the budget of Halde! That this useless and partial thing is abolished! As for "quality-labels" erroneously called "equality" and "diversity" they advocate the communautarisme! And is opposite in sold door-to-door m ritocratique advocated by the Statement of 1789! The only possible equality must be in rights. No preferential treatment must be allowed according to sex or to skin colour of the individual!
- Organisation of referendum on the treaty from Lisbon to Ireland (QE) June, 10, on 2009
On the organisation of referendum, really, there is nothing to say. It is the national legislation which is worth.
On the other hand They know that very recently, the European Commission spent the equivalent of the budget comm of coca extract Cola on all the countries where it exists For is telling "inform" the Irishmen (after " - ") while it is about ashamed one propaganda there! And there In the circumstances, the French Parliament has its word to be said, in sense where the money of the French taxpayer should not serve for financing comm of the European Commission, especially when she contacts a country as Ireland! The washing of brain is not, in my sense, an useful expense!
It would also be necessary to know, given that Mr Sarkozy said that he would go to defend the treaty in Ireland, has what title he takes the liberty of intervening in a national debate? And what a right he uses means of the State for his small exit! I see well which would have its reaction if external personalities had come to explain to Frenchmen why it is necessary to vote S. Royal! That he accepts the sovereign decision of the Irishmen. It will change!
- Scandalous no-claims bonus of the European Commissioners (QE) June, 10, on 2009
The partiality of the "Secretary of State " is scandalous. It is not because the site where information were drawn is (according to him) "eurosceptic" that given information is willy-nilly wrong! And conversely, it is not because the euro blissfully happy MR COWEN assures, via postcards (in the middle of the crisis however) the Irishmen that it got satisfaction on the protocol (while it is only about verbal promises!) that cel is true!
OK, first of all, "information" comes from a site particularly known by the dear "Secretary of State ": euractiv! And not the observatory of the EU!
Then, apart from scandal for the commissioners, there is scandal as the deputies. Very recently, they learnt that in a vast majority the European deputies agreed to harmonise, and by the top, the incomes of some category of citizens of the Union: the European elected representatives themselves.
Here is who should give again hope to other European citizens who wait undoubtedly from too to be put an on an equal footing wage in the Union! By the high good on!
To be completely honest, there are some losers well in affair: in this case, the Italian elected representatives. But these will keep their advantages until 2014: in other words, for the next legislature, and the possible renewal of their mandate.
I must here agree on it: yes, social Europe is possible, as the European Parliament shows it to us. Let us be able to use the very good availability which will be able to show our elected representatives thanks to their very new equipment of aquarobics to recollect to it them regularly!
Rich in useless institutions, in civil servants and in well paid consultants, Europe must show example. By abolishing for example some institutions among which each knows well that origin is a simple political concession to a politician of epoch. Where, even better, by announcing a plan of staff cut, strict savings, or measures of management. It is all the easier to make as nobody or almost depends, for his daily, on the job of the European institutions, what is more seldom case for hospitals, schools, utility.
Here is a logic of European action which could help the voter to consider Europe otherwise than as wrong essentials, a kind of form of financing of political life, a kind of obstacle as soft as possible on the road of progress. Uselessness is completely tolerable when it is efficient, that is, cost nothing!
- Jobs reserved in the civil service: decree of accession to the posts of category B and C unconditional of age June, 10, on 2009
Has him t he been? Published?
- General medicine: increase of the rates of consultations? (QE) June 4, on 2009
Token And if they "nationalised" the right "place" peculiar to Alsace Moselle? How explained it even recently your colleague Mr Jung, that ci holds the road well!
And so At the same time, they abolished the article 123 of the treaty said about Lisbon? I do not understand why it is necessary to pay interests to private banks, while to beat currency is a Regalian right! What they want to forbid the national banks to lend some money "free " to States, let us allow But then why not to allow BCE played the role of the national banks yesterday, in the field? Feared one the inflation? BCE just has mandate to avoid it! While wait t they? Here is a measure which would reduce considerably our national debt!
seb 13 july 2009 Answer
Some questions that he would be good, I think, to pose: either during the "meetings" of UMP, or during questions to the Government, or by written questions, as you made it. (Thank you for all his questions and answers)
1. At a time when we are in deep recession, why not to abolish the article 104 of the treaty of Maastricht, and the article 123 of the treaty of Lisbon?
Without this stupid system, our debt would be of O! Why not to take back the regalian right aiming at beating currency and at entrusting, if necessary, to BCE the care to "cause the members of the euro area, of the money "free "? (Without interest)
In 1992, this article had passed relatively well, can be because attention, and also had being not enough paid to it because we were in a stage the State it is wrong, lively happy globalisation . In 2009, things changed, and the private banks showed their dishonesty. Sincerely, I find scandalous that our nice France, but also all European countries having adopted the euro Are forced, by a treaty, to borrow on the financial market, or to the taxpayers savers to raise a financial system, which at the same time makes interests on our back! It is a bit as though a delinquent saw himself offir a battery of proposals and property, aiming at re-inserting him in the Society, and that At the same time, this delinquent takes advantage from his situation, on the back of the Society!
Today, I think that it is possible to find a large consensus to abolish these two articles, scandalous particularly in this period of economic, social crisis, and environmental, without speaking about collateral effects on the Society it even!
That some money on financial markets is injected so that those ci are to raise, let us accept. But, in what an indecent Society sums to us therefore thrown, so not only delinquent banks accept (without true counterpart in more!) of the public funds, but in more are possible recover the money of the interests of loans contracted by States to allow this bailing of the financial system?
Europe is exceedingly naive. By depriving the State, and the EU - via BCE - to beat currency and it free, that is of a regalian power, an all-powerful power was given to banks! It is not besides a chance if a magnate of banks, well-known (Rotschild) said even recently: say I who created the money, and I will say to you who governs the country .
It is not a question of causing a confusion in the EU current, only of not being the turkeys of joke. Have us the means to throw every year by the window of thousand millions to reimburse (am not this a roof space?) delinquent banks, which (which generosity!) have preT square of the money to States so that they raise a rotten system! They will point out, in passage, that the active rottenness always circulates so much.Ce who makes say to many observers, that they are going to suffer in October a financial tsunami even more important than that suffered until now.
He is sure that a consensus between States will be got to return on these two bad articles in the mentioned treaties. Why? Because these interests of debt, and debt it even, deprive the States to act as it would be necessary that they make it. I agree so that they the interests of debt, more debt are paid, which we have towards many countries, and which in passage endanger our independence (these countries by being our creditors have so a strong means of pressure) But from date t, it is necessary that to be the regalian power to beat currency are made to the States of the euro area, so that States could borrow some money without credit to pay interests to private banks, which delight some privileged! It does not call into question our other commitments, on the pact of stability. It is only giving again to States a power which they sold cheaply too quickly, and ill-advisedly (but everything can correct itself if there is desire of it: and the treaty of Lisbon is not approved. Why not to use it to put an amendment in this treaty to abolish the stupid lines registered in this last?) and means to act.
2. Recently, the German Constitutional court returned its verdict on the treaty of Lisbon. That ci considered that the power of the national Parliament was put in trouble by the treaty, which is not rather protective in relation to national sovereignty.
Contrary to France, the German Constitutional court took one year to examine from top to bottom the treaty of Lisbon - the Council of State belongs besides full recently (via its "contribution") of not enough time of examination of the text which had been given to him - and give its possible consent to the ratification already voted by both rooms of the Parliament.
On June 30th of this year, she returned her verdict and demanded guarantees to protect the sovereignty of the nation. And yet what is valid for German sovereignty it would not also be it for other countries members of the European Union? By ex France?
The Constitutional court considered unacceptable any modification of fundamental Law which touches principles dedicated in articles 1 and 20, underlining that European integration should not drive to the erosion of democratic order. Also important, she declares herself only competent to watch functions of the organs of the EU. (While the French Parliament leaves in the hands of CJCE (who has mandate to favour the interests of the Union, without caring about national Constitutions, and with good reason, in its sense those ci are obstacles to the Community law!) this power of control. Would not agreed him to give to the Constitutional Council the same power as takes the German Court?
By announcing that the Treaty is valid only in the interpretation given by the Court, the judges established new facts. They underline that if Germany wants to adhere to an European federal State, she will have to abandon expressly on the condition of national sovereignty guaranteed by fundamental Law and adopt a new Constitution. The European Union stays, according to them, an association of gouvernance of international law, subjected in a lasting way to the consent of sovereign States. The Constitutional Council shares this approach But has no means to make prevail over Constitution - by ex the notion of discriminations for the EU differs from the one that France has in the field - on some directives and r glements, without speaking about treaties. The French Parliament sells cheaply therefore, implicitly, the national sovereign, to the advantage of the EU!
Besides, judgement reminds that Constitution allows to the executive power neither to the parliamentarians nor to have its fundamental elements. The judges underline that it is possible to accept no modification of the fundamental Law concerning principles dedicated in articles 1 and 20, because they are protected by a permanent guarantee. So, the Court contradicts common dispositions listed under the Title 1 of the treaty of Lisbon, which maintain that the EU is the guarantor of human dignity, of freedom, of democracy, etc. These stocks belong to the intangible principles of fundamental Law, which are not under the command of policy. The Court of Karlsruhe also supported it for the article 20, which maintains that Germany is a social State and envisages a right of resistance in case this character would be implicated.
One wishes the same thing for France was made! The Parliament could - he is the constituent of the country is this step? - give to the Constitutional Council "carte blanche " to protect inherent principles in the constitutional identity of France, and in the same way to envisage that this last has competence to determine if an European treaty or a directive or a r glement undermines a constitutional tradition of France, such as a social.
The judges bring another important correction by adding that fundamental Law does not allow to the organs of the German State of transfer right sovereigns, so that their exercise serves for motivating additional competences in an autonomous way. The transfer of competence-competence is forbidden. The judges indicate by this neologism simplified procedure of modification of the Treaty of Lisbon, by virtue of which the Council of the EU wanted it could allow themselves of new skills without the agreement of other authorities. Karl-Albrecht Schachtschneider, professor of public law, qualified this measure as law of exception .
They are surprised that the French Parliament, which has to to act as part of general interest Accepts such "law" of exception !
Since then, would be possible one not have a true debate, in France, on what it would be necessary to put in constitutional law aiming at protecting national sovereignty? In although on the French Parliament if accomode of democratic deficit of the EU ET of " borders in Democracy that puts down the treaty of Lisbon!
2.
3.
4.
seb 13 july 2009 Answer
Copyright Christian Vanneste - Deputy of the North 2007. All rights reserved.