By Eric Buyssechaert 8 seven 2009 in young people Pop'
On Saturday morning, Frederick Mitterrand was the guest star of the summer university of UMP in Seignosse. He was a big hit.
First style. The new minister of Culture, who had the right to the plenary room to work on topic culture to change the world , has chooses not to express itself sat or behind a stand. The ancient newscaster of television wandered on stage, microphone at the hand.
Side answers, also, it was rather well. Young UMP could ask the questions by SMS. Mitterrand shows all expanse of the talent there. A truth one man show.
CSA raised the vulgarity of some TV programmes reality. What do you intend to make? As it is questioned him. Anything answers. We are in a free society. And to continue: Nobody is obliged to look at a programme of television reality. Yesterday evening, in my hotel room a cloud of aaaaaah rises of the room. Mitterrand resumes: It is finished to it, when they are minister. They are wise Finally it is perhaps possible to speak about it afterwards. Therefore yesterday, I looked at Secret Story, some long instants even, a bit as a scholar leans over an entomological room. Then I passed on Two, where there was fortunately I. And you want that I intervene in a television system where there was on the one hand horror and vulgarity and of other one perfect example of culture. Never! Thunder of laughs and of applauses On est sage Enfin on peut peut- tre en parler apr s. Donc hier, j ai regard Secret Story, quelques longs instants m me, un peu comme un savant se penche sur une pi ce entomologique. Puis je suis pass sur la Deux, o il y avait par bonheur moi. Et vous voulez que j intervienne dans un syst me t l visuel o il y avait d un c t l horreur et la vulgarit et de l autre la quintessence de la culture. Jamais! Tonnerre de rires et d applaudissements
Is it enough to shout to be an artist? , as it is asked him. The master of the street of Valois uses it to make his mea culpa on Orelsan, the rapper, author of Nasty prostitute, whom he had compared with Rimbaud, after the d programmation this last of which had been "victim" during Francofolies of Rochelle in July. I perhaps went too quickly, he says, but I do not support the idea of censure. But in equal importance, I do not support verbal attack. The purposes of this rapper were very hard. If other rappers are listened, they often say very hard things. In the climate which was there, the will of censure took it on attack. Today I will have tendency to be more strict.
Questioned about the regional languages, he declares his flame to the writer Antillean Maryse Cond : France did not admit her as he would have had to admit her. He says his opposition to any simplification of orthography or his belief in the good health of the French language: There remains everything. It is not because they eat big mac or because jeans are carried that it is not possible to read Paul Val ry. Stop with this desolate vision of the French language. She is inevitably alive.
It will have lasted one hour. At the end of his first political meeting, Frederick Mitterrand has the right to nice one social status ovation.
He goes back up in my respect F. Mitterrand! A good baffe in Closets, who obviously took the big head! (And here is what it makes to have two best sellers)
I read the book of Mr Closets A the library (so much read it, but buy it not). What indigestible purposes!
In his/her opinion, the workmanship of lexical orthography (the respect for the written form of words) would be a "donation" (founded on visual memory), and not the fruit of a training. Here is the argument which puts forward Mr de Closets to call his wishes a desecration of orthography . Reconnait Mr de Closets he even to be a victim.
This mister makes me think, of all, of those who pretend to be modern by moving forward pretended ideas iconoclasts, but who have no slightest idea of the world in which we live in reality. They have count to be regulated but do not measure to what extent their small vendetta, applied at the level of the society, can turn out to be catastrophic. Instead of paying an analysis with the incomes of his previous books qui-enfoncent-des-portes-ouvertes, Mr de Closets thinks he is clever to empty publicly.
Yes, many people, especially djeunz is " challeng s " level orthography. It is a fact. But mostly, it is not a question of visual memory, but simply because they do not read any more, and because they knock each other about, symptom of a decline of the level of education. Some people write so badly that they become there incomprehensible. Lower requirements in orthography, it is not to render service, it is to condemn a little more for the social exclusion from people who already have a heavy liability. It is to abandon the idea moreover a little more of transmitting our culture.
But it, Mr de Closets who should not take out 6 of me arrondissement a lot, goes a t-il count there?
Let us follow the argument of Closets: the bump of orthography would be physiological, and therefore at the origin of discriminations. A step besides, and parents will bring an action against Educ Nat so that they cease noting their child " challeng on orthography. From there, everything is possible. If orthography is not any more noted, it will not be any more taught or studied seriously, it is a natural law.
Of course pretend that it exists at the level of the high school of discriminations founded on orthography am aberrant with regard to the rate of success in the RECEPTACLE. I think that for a long time orthography is not any more considered as blest by the teachers. Where moreover Mr de Closet contradicts himself himself, by putting forward the argument of the keyboard who revolutionises the way to write , it is that keyboards just have spell checkers, correcting so what constitutes a discrimination in his/her opinion. I add that some have problems of coordination or of reflexes: is it necessary to give up teaching the highway code?
As all too clever people (on the paper), Mr de Closets forgets the basic laws of natural mother. It is the pressure which makes develop. The absence of pressure draws away the decline of living organisms.
PS: I have no claim me even to control orthography.
PS2: the rumour-mongers say that this book is an order of some Nicolas S., influential man, who would not support what exceeds him. Having followed of its aggression the general knowledge (princess of cl ves), it is the orthography which would be from now on in its collimator. (Finally, it would be is possible be a good idea: never the princess of cl ves was never sold as well!)
seb 9 seven 2009
Copyright Christian Vanneste - Deputy of the North 2007. All rights reserved.